Worst WR corps to play in SB?
-
- Posts: 2229
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Worst WR corps to play in SB?
Where will Panthers wide-outs rank?
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
-
- Posts: 2229
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
- 74_75_78_79_
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
Yes...LOTS of choices! Many if you're talking strictly SB-winners, but we're talking PARTICIPANTS so the list can be endless! It seems, historically, that most champions or those who play for the title don't need a 'premiere' WR corps.JohnTurney wrote:there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
-
- Posts: 2229
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
going by participants since we don't know if Panthers will win or not74_75_78_79_ wrote:Yes...LOTS of choices! Many if you're talking strictly SB-winners, but we're talking PARTICIPANTS so the list can be endless! It seems, historically, that most champions or those who play for the title don't need a 'premiere' WR corps.JohnTurney wrote:there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
-
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
The San Diego based writer Jerry Magee loved to ridicule the Los Angeles Rams in his Pro Football Weekly column. I recall in 1979 Magee wrote of the Rams: "They have no wide receivers." The only part of the Rams Magee admired was the defensive line. He also observed that the 1978-79 Rams often failed to cover the spread even when they won.JohnTurney wrote:there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.