PFRA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the history of professional football. Formed in 1979, PFRA members include many of the game's foremost historians and writers.
https://profootballresearchers.com/forum/
https://profootballresearchers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3366
They probably are going on the assumption that the vast majority of fans either don't care or are too stupid to know the difference.Terry Baldshaw wrote:What a travesty of a production. The NFL Network should be ashamed for producing this atrocity. A third of the screen was blocked and the inane ramblings of the blowbags were maddening. What a waste!
Two is the only one where NONE of the actual telecast has been SEEN--not sure if any audio survived.single wing wrote:They also mentioned that Super Bowl 2 is incomplete.... Anyone have any idea what Super Bowls there are that the original broadcast does not exist ?
There NEEDS to be a PFRA Network (or, simply, the Pro Football History Channel) with some of you guys either working behind the scenes and/or as the main commentators and/or as guest commentators, etc. If I were a multi-millionaire, I'd certainly invest!Terry Baldshaw wrote:What a travesty of a production. The NFL Network should be ashamed for producing this atrocity. A third of the screen was blocked and the inane ramblings of the blowbags were maddening. What a waste!
If that's the case then why did they even bother with it period?BD Sullivan wrote:They probably are going on the assumption that the vast majority of fans either don't care or are too stupid to know the difference.Terry Baldshaw wrote:What a travesty of a production. The NFL Network should be ashamed for producing this atrocity. A third of the screen was blocked and the inane ramblings of the blowbags were maddening. What a waste!
Mariucci was the only commentator who watched the game (at 10, almost same age I was when I saw 'Freezer Bowl'/'The Catch') yet alone was alive when it happened.MIKEBENNIDICT wrote:If that's the case then why did they even bother with it period?BD Sullivan wrote:They probably are going on the assumption that the vast majority of fans either don't care or are too stupid to know the difference.Terry Baldshaw wrote:What a travesty of a production. The NFL Network should be ashamed for producing this atrocity. A third of the screen was blocked and the inane ramblings of the blowbags were maddening. What a waste!
There is a radio broadcast of the game, and somebody created a merge of the game film and radio broadcast,BD Sullivan wrote:Two is the only one where NONE of the actual telecast has been SEEN--not sure if any audio survived.single wing wrote:They also mentioned that Super Bowl 2 is incomplete.... Anyone have any idea what Super Bowls there are that the original broadcast does not exist ?