I don't think my post directly addressed it but my vote would be for Alexander. A bit perplexed he's been nowhere to be found thus far in the HOF process but I have faith he will be found.TanksAndSpartans wrote:I'd say no on Watters and I think there's a better methodology here than who showed up on the most ballots. What if you weighted it so a 1st place vote was worth 5 points, a 2nd 3 points, and a 3rd 1 point? Or you could do something fancier like a Borda count.
Also, I couldn't get the numbers to add up:
I think there should be 30 votes (10 folks each with 3 votes), but I only see 21 votes above:readjack wrote: 0 votes: Barber, Jackson, Lewis, Taylor
1 vote: Dillon, George
5 votes: Alexander, Holmes
9 votes: Ricky Watters
9/10 of us
Dillon: 1
George: 1
Alexander: 5
Holmes: 5
Watters: 9
Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
- TanksAndSpartans
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:05 am
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
Too bad the OP didn't come back, but my thought was if they looked at the voting how I suggested, Alexander might come out on top - he would have been my choice too.Zero26 wrote: I don't think my post directly addressed it but my vote would be for Alexander. A bit perplexed he's been nowhere to be found thus far in the HOF process but I have faith he will be found.
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
I heard the voting took place in the state of Florida.TanksAndSpartans wrote:Too bad the OP didn't come back, but my thought was if they looked at the voting how I suggested, Alexander might come out on top - he would have been my choice too.Zero26 wrote: I don't think my post directly addressed it but my vote would be for Alexander. A bit perplexed he's been nowhere to be found thus far in the HOF process but I have faith he will be found.
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
This just in, Ricky Williams won the poll scoring a shocking upset!Bryan wrote:I heard the voting took place in the state of Florida.TanksAndSpartans wrote:Too bad the OP didn't come back, but my thought was if they looked at the voting how I suggested, Alexander might come out on top - he would have been my choice too.Zero26 wrote: I don't think my post directly addressed it but my vote would be for Alexander. A bit perplexed he's been nowhere to be found thus far in the HOF process but I have faith he will be found.
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
Sorry! Hi. I agree: I'm surprised Alexander hasn't gained support in 10 years of eligibility. Our PFHOF mock committee has had him consistently in our semifinals, yet when we had this call, there were some new people and they just didn't feel like he was dangerous as a runner, and had a short peak. He doesn't feel like a "short career" guy because he didn't have that singular devastating injury like TD or Priest, but they pointed to his entire run being contained in five seasons, albeit consecutive and culminating in his record-setting 2005.TanksAndSpartans wrote:Zero26 wrote: Too bad the OP didn't come back, but my thought was if they looked at the voting how I suggested, Alexander might come out on top - he would have been my choice too.
In an interview I did in 2013 with Hunter Hillenmeyer about Adrian Peterson, (https://readjack.wordpress.com/2015/08/ ... mortality/) I asked Hunter for other RBs who the Bears worried about and game-planned for, and when he didn't mention Alexander I asked him about him specifically, since the Bears obviously played some huge games against Alexander. Hunter's response:
"Shaun never struck me as that (??). He was great at getting tough yards but he still usually got tackled. He might carry a guy for an extra two-and-a-half yards, but I never got the impression that Shaun was a guy who could break three tackles and then go for 40 extra yards. You see that every single day from AP."
That was the essence of the complaints of some of the guys in our RB call, so it's totally possible that that's what's holding him back with voters. But I do think that as voters try to sort out all of these 2000s running backs, they'll look for resume elements that distinguish one guy from another, and 100 rushing touchdowns is a big-ass number that distinguishes him.
-
- Posts: 3205
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
It will be interesting when Marshawn Lynch becomes eligible. I would endorse him because he ran angry and like Walter Payton and recently Derrick Henry, would dare the defenses to tackle him. With postseason he has over 100 career TDs and was a missed carry away from back-to-back championships. Had clutch NE linebacker Dont'a Hightower not made a great tackle of him inside the two yard line, the SB would have went to Seattle ...
-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:57 pm
Re: Should Ricky Watters be the next RB in Canton?
If you're going to consider Priest Holmes and Ricky Watters, why not think about LeSean McCoy?
Versatile back, 6x Pro Bowl, 2x first-team All-Pro, 2x SB champ, 15k career total yards, 6x 1,000+ yard rushing seasons, 89 total touchdowns; dynamic when he was with the Eagles from 2010 to 2014;
However, not eligible until 2025.
Versatile back, 6x Pro Bowl, 2x first-team All-Pro, 2x SB champ, 15k career total yards, 6x 1,000+ yard rushing seasons, 89 total touchdowns; dynamic when he was with the Eagles from 2010 to 2014;
However, not eligible until 2025.