Tony Romo

Wendell02
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:21 pm
Location: Mount Juliet, TN

Tony Romo

Post by Wendell02 »

Well, here we are six weeks into the season. Your thoughts on Mr. Romo in the booth? I think he is ok, a little chatty but enthusiastic.
JohnH19
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:18 pm

Re: Tony Romo

Post by JohnH19 »

He's an improvement over Phil Simms.
sheajets
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:22 am

Re: Tony Romo

Post by sheajets »

I think he's terrific. Was wrong about this from the start. He's a natural

I still think he's kicking around the idea of playing next year, one final run at it before going back in the booth. But who knows he may settle in and never leave. Lots of coaches we expected to be out in 3-4 years and back on the field just end up staying.
rhickok1109
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:57 am

Re: Tony Romo

Post by rhickok1109 »

He talks a little too much and a little too fast, but I think he offers a lot of insight into what's going on--unlike Aikman, who at best basically does a verbal replay and at worst makes very little sense.
ChrisBabcock
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Tonawanda, NY

Re: Tony Romo

Post by ChrisBabcock »

and at worst makes very little sense.
...like at the end of the first half of Packers/Vikings this past Sunday. Vikings had 4th down and 20+ with less than 10 seconds left in the half, slightly behind midfield. Aikman then starts droning on about how all they need is whatever amount of yards (15?) to get into FG range.
:shock:
7DnBrnc53
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Tony Romo

Post by 7DnBrnc53 »

sheajets wrote:I think he's terrific. Was wrong about this from the start. He's a natural

I still think he's kicking around the idea of playing next year, one final run at it before going back in the booth. But who knows he may settle in and never leave. Lots of coaches we expected to be out in 3-4 years and back on the field just end up staying.
I was watching Colin Cowherd's show on FS1 yesterday (which is a rarity for me). They were talking about Romo leaving CBS and replacing A-Rod. Colin thinks that Romo would be afraid to leave because he knows that Peyton Manning would fill his shoes immediately and never look back (he also mentioned something about how A-Rod may become Romo 2.0: Another talented, undersized QB [Rodgers is 6'2', so he isn't really undersized] that had to carry a team and had to retire before they were ready because of multiple injuries).
Reaser
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 11:58 am
Location: WA

Re: Tony Romo

Post by Reaser »

A mix of a middle school boy nervously excited to be watching and talking about football, mixed with a professional QB with a high football IQ that likes to talk about what's really happening on the field (x's and o's, schemes, situations, etc.)

Not a polished broadcaster, at all. Might be part of what is making him pretty good at it, though?
L.C. Greenwood
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 8:53 am

Re: Tony Romo

Post by L.C. Greenwood »

7DnBrnc53 wrote:
sheajets wrote:I think he's terrific. Was wrong about this from the start. He's a natural

I still think he's kicking around the idea of playing next year, one final run at it before going back in the booth. But who knows he may settle in and never leave. Lots of coaches we expected to be out in 3-4 years and back on the field just end up staying.
I was watching Colin Cowherd's show on FS1 yesterday (which is a rarity for me). They were talking about Romo leaving CBS and replacing A-Rod. Colin thinks that Romo would be afraid to leave because he knows that Peyton Manning would fill his shoes immediately and never look back (he also mentioned something about how A-Rod may become Romo 2.0: Another talented, undersized QB [Rodgers is 6'2', so he isn't really undersized] that had to carry a team and had to retire before they were ready because of multiple injuries).
One can definitely understand Romo being tempted to make a comeback, he has major unfinished business in terms of his career. I really don't know about Peyton Manning as a broadcaster, it's difficult to project right now. Also don't understand the Rodgers-Romo analogy, too early to tell if Rodgers will have a shortened career.
User avatar
fgoodwin
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:10 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Tony Romo

Post by fgoodwin »

L.C. Greenwood wrote: One can definitely understand Romo being tempted to make a comeback, he has major unfinished business in terms of his career. I really don't know about Peyton Manning as a broadcaster, it's difficult to project right now. Also don't understand the Rodgers-Romo analogy, too early to tell if Rodgers will have a shortened career.
Romo was in the league for thirteen seasons, although he spent his first 2-1/2 riding the pine (and he lost 2-1/2 due to injury).

Rodgers has also been in the league for thirteen seasons, the first three as a backup, and he also lost about a season due to injury. If Rodgers has a shortened career, then so did Romo. But I don't see 13 years (nine as a starter) a short career.

Of course with Tom Brady playing for 18 seasons (one as a backup, one lost to injury) and Peyton Manning playing for 18 seasons (one lost to injury), not to mention Brett Favre's twenty seasons (one as a backup), what counts as a long or short career is being redefined.
User avatar
74_75_78_79_
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm

Re: Tony Romo

Post by 74_75_78_79_ »

Reaser wrote:A mix of a middle school boy nervously excited to be watching and talking about football, mixed with a professional QB with a high football IQ that likes to talk about what's really happening on the field (x's and o's, schemes, situations, etc.)

Not a polished broadcaster, at all. Might be part of what is making him pretty good at it, though?
Dropped some nice knowledge broadcasting today’s Bengals/Steelers game! Knowledge that I even forgot if however momentarily. Talking about Steelers’ defense tradition, he said that in their eight SB-appearances that the only year their O ranked higher than their D was in ‘79 when the O was #1 and the D was at #2. I was impressed! Let him talk like a kid who just got into football but with the high football IQ just the same. It’s well needed!
Post Reply