Professional Football Researchers Association Forum

.....Ray Didinger stated he thought Thomas was overrated as a corner with the Raiders. To me, if anything, he was underrated with Oakland. He would knock the ball down, instead of making the interceptions, and he would have waffle hands, at times. But, I think he was a very physically imposing corne...

Good one, B.D.

HA!!!!!!!!!

[quote="74_75_78_79_"]I would take the 'Dirty Birds' in this one, but both these squads deserve comparison with each another hence legitimizing this thread. People easily forget that SD actually did start out 6-0 in '94. The key thing both have in common, of course, is both squads being th...

Ok. I'm going to be the one to have to do it. Love him, think he's a HOF'ER, but he the second best Woodson to play DB. He belongs in, but did wand in the wilderness for a number of years with rumors of alcoholism, I cannot lend credence tk that or not, but he had a series of meaningless years in t...

Ok. I'm going to be the one to have to do it. Love him, think he's a HOF'ER, but he the second best Woodson to play DB. He belongs in, but did wand in the wilderness for a number of years with rumors of alcoholism, I cannot lend credence tk that or not, but he had a series of meaningless years in t...

Yes, Isiah Robertson caused Earl Campbell to fumble earlier in that game.

Mark Carrier was excellent his first few years in the NFL as well. He was not the caliber of Browner, Easley, Cherry, Patton, etc., but he was damn good.

As for Kramer, yes, he should have already been in ions ago, IMO.

I have NEVER seen the major love for Kuechenberg being a HOFer. How many times has he been a finalist, six times? I do not get it. How is he more qualified than Ken Gray, for example? Kent Hill has arguably as good a case. Dennis Harrah is another. Walt Sweeney (excluding his personal issues), Ed Bu...

Easley is my answer....followed by Steve Atwater...at least as far as the ones I have seen play.